New Hampshire Casino License Scandal: Investigators Disqualified in Concord Case

A New Hampshire judge ruled this week that two investigators for the prosecution cannot participate in the ongoing legal case involving Concord Casino co-owner Andy Sanborn. A New Hampshire judge ruled this week that two investigators for the prosecution cannot participate in the ongoing legal case involving Concord Casino co-owner Andy Sanborn, a development that could significantly impact the scrutiny surrounding the stability of his casino license.

Merrimack County Superior Court Judge John Kissinger disqualified New Hampshire Assistant Attorney General David Lovejoy and forensic examiner Don Swanson after they viewed privileged attorney-client information.

Swanson saw 146 documents that Sanborn’s lawyers said were privileged, and Lovejoy saw three protected documents.

Because AAG Lovejoy and Mr. Swanson were privy to this protected information, suppression of the material alone will not remedy the State’s misconduct,” Kissinger said in a ruling.
“Thus, the Court imposes equitable relief through the disqualification of AAG Lovejoy and Mr. Swanson.”

The issue began on May 23, 2024, when investigators searched the Concord Casino, seizing five computers and 30 boxes of documents, according to the Concord Monitor.
In the boxes, were documents where Sanborn and his attorneys wrote about courtroom strategies.
Such documents are privileged and shouldn’t be viewed by those involved in the prosecution.

If anyone else involved in the prosecution improperly saw the documents, that person should contact Kissinger and get disqualified from the case,
the judge said.

Kissinger added that the New Hampshire Attorney General’s office showed “gross negligence” and “prosecutorial misconduct,” the Monitor reported.

State officials defended their actions.
“What actually occurred was a simple mistake, which the NH DOJ deeply regrets,” Michael Garrity,
director of communications for the New Hampshire Department of Justice,
said in a statement provided to the Monitor.

“When the NH DOJ hired a third-party vendor to duplicate a database of seized materials, the contractor inadvertently included privileged documents,”
Garrity added.
“This was not intentional misconduct,
but a single, unintentional mistake that was promptly addressed.”

Charge Not Dismissed

Sanborn’s attorneys, however, failed in their attempt to get the judge to dismiss a theft charge against Sanborn.
The next hearing on the case will be held on March 10.

Sanborn was charged for allegedly increasing the casino’s revenue by approximately $1M to receive more state government funds.

Sanborn’s Gaming License Suspended

Sanborn’s gaming license was suspended in December 2023 following an investigation into his application for a $844K COVID-19 federal relief loan.
Casinos didn’t qualify for the loan.
Sanborn was told to sell the casino.

Appeal Pending

Sanborn’s attorneys recently filed an appeal with the state Supreme Court alleging that the New Hampshire Lottery Commission and the Attorney General’s office illegally kept Sanborn from selling the casino.
State officials denied the accusations.

Another part of Sanborn’s argument points out that Administrative Law Judge Gregory Albert,
who recently ruled against Sanborn, recognized it was reasonable to provide Sanborn another extension to sell the charitable casino,
according to New Hampshire Public Radio (NHPR).

Albert gave the Lottery Commission permission to revoke the license for two years.
For Sanborn to now sell the gaming property,
the license needs to be put back into effect,
according to Sanborn’s attorneys.

Bettor Investment Group and Full House Resorts Inc. Show Interest in Concord Casino

An entity called Bettor Investment Group recently attempted to purchase Concord Casino, according to the Monitor.
Full House Resorts Inc. was also interested in acquiring the Concord Casino,
the report revealed.

Learn More About 10BET

Summary: A New Hampshire judge disqualified two investigators from a case involving Concord Casino co-owner Andy Sanborn due to their viewing of privileged attorney-client information.

AAG Lovejoy and Mr. Swanson were found to have seen protected documents, leading to the disqualification of both officials.
The issue began when investigators searched the casino, seizing five computers and 30 boxes of documents containing privileged material.

The New Hampshire Attorney General’s office was accused of “gross negligence” and “prosecutorial misconduct,” with state officials defending their actions as a simple mistake.

Conclusion:

p

Despite the disqualification, Sanborn’s attorneys failed to get the judge to dismiss the theft charge against Sanborn.
The case is set to proceed with the next hearing on March 10.
Sanborn faces a charge of allegedly increasing casino revenue by $1M to receive state government funds.
His gaming license was suspended in December 2023 following an investigation into his application for a COVID-19 federal relief loan.

Related guide: Play Now

Legal Dispute Over Illegal Games Forces California Casino Cardrooms to Provide Surveillance Footage

A California Superior Court judge in Sacramento has granted a request by a coalition of tribal operators to order dozens of casino cardrooms to provide the court with eye-in-the-sky surveillance footage of their games. A California Superior Court judge in Sacramento has granted a request by a coalition of tribal operators to order dozens of casino cardrooms to provide the court with eye-in-the-sky surveillance footage of their games. Through this legal mandate, the tribes aim to scrutinize the operations within these casino cardrooms, hoping the footage will ultimately vindicate their claim that certain games offered by some establishments constitute illegal gambling games.

Background

The tribes, including the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla, the Pechanga Band of Indians, the Kumeyaay Nation, and the San Manuel Nation, have sued California’s cardrooms on January 1 for offering illegal gambling in violation of the state constitution and the California Penal Code.

California Games

The tribes have complained that the cardrooms’ so-called “California games” – versions of popular casino table games like blackjack and pai gow poker – violate tribal exclusivity on house-banked casino games.

Key Differences Between Tribal Exclusivity and California Games

• Tribal exclusivity mandates the actual rotation of the bank, whereas California games allow for a rake to be taken from each hand while allowing players to play in a rotating dealer position.
• The tribes argue that this allows players to act as their own bank, rather than the house acting as the bank.

The cardrooms claim that their games do not violate the ban on house-banked games because they allow players to choose when and if they want to act as the dealer. They hire state-licensed third parties to “shill” in the dealer spot, which is a de facto bank.

Access to Justice

The tribes have previously lacked standing to sue the cardrooms due to limited jurisdiction over sovereign nations. However, the California legislature passed the Tribal Nations Access to Justice Act last year, which opens a window for the tribes to apply to state courts for limited declaratory relief.

Consequences for Cardrooms

• The cardrooms will be required to provide overhead surveillance footage of their games from December 28, 2004, from 12.00 a.m. to 11.59 p.m.
• If the footage is incomplete, they must provide additional footage from December 31.

This case highlights the ongoing debate about tribal exclusivity and California games. The outcome will have significant implications for the future of gaming in the state.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the California cardrooms have been ordered to provide surveillance footage of their games as part of a lawsuit filed by a coalition of tribal operators. The tribes hope this will vindicate their claim that some games offered by some card rooms constitute illegal gambling games. The outcome of this case will be closely watched in the gaming industry and beyond.

Related guide: Play Now

Rivalry’s Q1 2025 financial statement highlights a significant surge in operational efficiencies, driven largely by the rapid expansion of their sports betting platform. Rivalry’s Q1 2025 financial statement highlights a significant surge in operational efficiencies, driven largely by the rapid expansion of their sports betting platform. As the company optimizes its infrastructure to handle increased wagering volumes, these new-found efficiencies are positioning Rivalry to dominate the evolving sports betting market.

Mark Keast Read More

A New Era for Rivalry Corp: Streamlining Operations to Fuel the Future of Sports Betting

Toronto-based Rivalry Corp. has released its Q1 2025 financial results, showcasing the benefits of a new operating structure.

Related guide: Play Now

Casinos Face Headwinds as Golden Entertainment Downgraded Amid Waning M&A Catalysts

In a new report to clients, Truist Securities analyst Barry Jonas lowered his rating on Golden Entertainment to ‘hold’ from ‘buy,’ signaling a more cautious outlook for the companys position. In a new report to clients, Truist Securities analyst Barry Jonas lowered his rating on Golden Entertainment to “hold” from “buy,” signaling a more cautious outlook for the companys position within the competitive landscape of major casinos. While trimming his price target on the stock to $34 from $36, Jonas notes that the new price objective still implies a potential upside of 12.7% from where the shares reside at this writing.

Jonas noted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) at the Strat — the operator’s marquee Las Vegas casino — could disappoint. We take Q2 EBITDA estimates down -5% on Strat weakness (now -4% below the Street).

The Current State of Golden Entertainment’s M&A Landscape

We had expected 2025 to see an inflection to some EBITDA growth Y/Y, but now expect a -4% contraction for the year (lowering our 2025E EBITDA by -4%, which is -2% below the Street.),” observes Jonas. “Our new PT of $34 (vs. prior $36) based on ~7x our 2026E EV/EBITDA.”

No M&A Boost on the Horizon for Golden Entertainment

For months, one of the oft-cited catalysts for owning Golden Entertainment stock has been the possibility of a value-creating transaction, either in the form of selling an individual casino or monetizing its real estate holdings. However, transactions have yet to materialize and the current environment isn’t conducive to gaming industry asset sales.

The company has made clear it’s likely to be more of a seller than a buyer, but the lack of M&A activity in the pipeline implies that Golden would be best served to wait on the sidelines. “We have often cited M&A optionality as a backstop for GDEN, but don’t see anything there imminent. The M&A acquisition pipeline doesn’t appear deep for GDEN in the current environment, while the interest rate environment doesn’t seem to support material upside in a sale environment,” adds Jonas.

The Strat’s Value

In terms of property value, The Strat is the crown jewel in the Golden portfolio. Located near the Las Vegas Strip, that venue could fetch a significant percentage of the operator’s market capitalization in a potential sale. Should such a deal come to pass, it would likely be in sale-leaseback form.

Gaming Taverns: A Silver Lining

Golden is the largest operator of gaming taverns in the Las Vegas Valley. Those venues, which include PT’s Pubs, among other brands, feature gaming machines, bar food, and are popular among locals. Jonas notes Golden-operated pubs have been prudent on the promotional front, but the venues probably won’t pick up the slack created by the Strat’s weakness.

The Impact of Nevada’s Unemployment Rate

Las Vegas-area gaming taverns could see spending and visitation retrenchment owing to Nevada’s 5.5% unemployment rate, which is the highest in the nation. This may have a more profound impact on the Strat given its lower-end customer base and well-known weakness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Golden Entertainment faces significant challenges ahead, including a struggling marquee property and a lack of M&A activity. While gaming taverns remain a viable option for the company, they may not be enough to offset the impact of the Strat’s weakness.

Related guide: Play Now